Yes. I began reading the article with an open mind. Sad story, even though I may not like it hunting bears is legal after all.
However... I usually scream when politics are brought into unrelated threads and I'm not doing so now, but I'm afraid that I had a sinking feeling when I read the hunter's posts about Hope jerky and Hope in a crockpot. It seemed to me that he was making a statement.
My understanding is that Lynn Rogers advocates baiting, and I trust Lynn wholeheartedly. Baiting unfair? Definitely. BUT, it brings them out into the open where hunters have a clean shot. I would much rather have a bear taken out quickly, than being wounded and suffering.
No, he just doesn't want psychotic eco-terrorists harrassing his family. You know, the mentally ill segment of our population that equate human life with animal life.....like you I suppose! The idiots who send a man to prison for 2 years for killing dogs(vicious problem breeds at that), when a man who is drunk and runs down and kills a father of 3 gets probation.
I don't know which story you're referring to concerning "a man who is drunk and runs down and kills a father of 3 gets probation." However, the fact that the system may have failed in one instance doesn't invalidate a decision made in an entirely unrelated case. Your logic is faulty.
Also, if you're going to go throwing around the word "idiot," you should probably make sure you don't look like one in the process. Vick was under investigation for running and financing an illegal interstate dog fighting operation. Those prosecuting him were originally intending on going after him under RICO provisions, again for financing and running illegal business operations. I can't really say there's anything idiotic about jailing someone for any of that ... because it's illegal - and it doesn't take an eco-terrorist to see that. The fact that he executed and/or had others execute animals did not help his case.
Poor bear. I wish him rebirth as a hunter, and wish the hunter a rebirth as the bear. So that the bear can then get even with the hunter... and then there will be another article and I will wish reverse again. So goes on the story of earth!.
I think we need to be worried about this hunter. "Lily, a bear with a bounty" sounds like something a sick mind would say. Why did he have it in for this bear?
Why would anyone wish to kill a bear? Do hunters eat bears? Anyone who enjoys killing a helpless, defenseless animal is mentally ill. Just seeing a bear in the wild does it for me.
Yes, hunters and some non-hunters eat bear meat. Getting a bear is not as easy as you would think. They are smart and if you miss, can be deadly.
Black bears are not endangered either. Around the county that I live in, I know of 9 cubs born this year. I'm sure there are a lot more that I don't know about.
Hunting of bear, deer and other wildlife keeps the population in check. All you anti-hunting people should go to Audubon's website and read some of the pro-hunting (deer) articles that Ted Williams has written over the years.
Here's one to start with. It is on deer.
Most hunters, the responsible ones anyways, are for conservation of fields, forests, streams, lakes and rivers.
Not to poke at the issue too much, but hunting keeps the population in check from what? From what it would be if there weren't people hunting, or keeping it from a critical mass at which point you have human-animal interactions on the highway?
Hunting keeps the animal population in check from mass starvation from over consuming the resources available in the habitat. If the population is left unchecked, every one of the animals will starve. Then you have a secondary kill off, of another species that consumed the one that died out in the first starvation incident. Then you have other die offs, because the first species ate all the vegetation that might have been left over if hunting had reduced their numbers to a level that the habitat could support.
So, bottom line, all of you anti-hunters are the most virulent animal haters on the planet, if we had your way, all of the wildlife would die off, in a most horrible manner.
Many hunters I know are avid outdoors men that appreciate nature.
With that said. I choose not to hunt, mainly because I don't see hunting as a fair game. I can shoot pretty good and killing an animal that doesn't know i'm there from a 1/4 mile away hardly seems like a sport. Then you have to hack up this thing of beauty so you can pack it out. Seem's like a big pain in the ass. If you want good meat raise a heard of deer yourself. Wild animals have it hard enough.
I would prefer to enjoy them in the wild, let the cougars, wolf's and coyotes do the killing. If you want a real challenge that involves guns join the Marines.
So is it a "fair game" when a cow, a chicken, or a pig is crowded into a smelly truck, hauled into a processing plant, and killed amidst the terror-filled cries and stench of blood arising from its fellows? How hard did you have to work for the last steak you "hunted" at the supermarket? Sorry, but if you eat meat and buy it from giant agribusiness, YOU are the one supporting cruelty to animals! Yes, there are "trophy hunters" out there who care little to nothing about the animal, but most hunters are far more aware of the costs of survival and our indebtedness to the natural world than their critics are. Too many people slog complacently along, consuming the "products" of "factory farming" and believing they have deniability. Those same people are all too often ready to criticize the hunter who kills "Bambi's mom" to feed his/her family. That is the definition of hypocrisy.
So is it a "fair game" when a cow, a chicken, or a pig is crowded into a smelly truck, hauled into a processing plant, and killed amidst the terror-filled cries and stench of blood arising from its fellows
Sounds pretty bad when you put it that way. But they are raised by human hands and provided for their whole life. Which they would not have in the wild. We raise them to eat them.
Bambi, was born in the wild. Life is difficult for Bamabi since she has to worry about predators, starvation, finding water and reproducing. Not to mention us trying to run them over in our cars and shoot them.
If I needed to survive off the land I would. I don't need to know I can, I know I can shoot a gun and know where to find animals. No more lessons necessary. Try becoming that Factory farmer. Which by the way, I eat local grass fed beef and free range chicken, so not really factory farmed food, I am against that. But trying to raise an animal is hard work. They aren't popping out every few seconds.
You sound pretty enraged, so maybe i'm infringing on a sacred belief of yours. But like I said, some of my friends and family hunt. I don't tell them they are bad, or that I hate them. I just have my feelings on the issue.
I'd say if you are "man enough" to be a hunter then you should be man enough to release your name. I think this just proves the theory that hunters are only "tough" when they are heavily armed and sniping at small critters. When it comes to being a real man and facing the consequences of your actions or admitting your wrongs, they are no where to be found.
Yea, Dranon. Nice try, spode. They release his name and every bambi loving person on the planet will want his blood, as ironic as that may be.
Now, as for any hunter that get up in a tree stand and baits a drum to lure hapless animals. That's pretty chickensh*t. I once saw a show where Ted Nugent was doing that and was all proud of it. King Spode.
I would not let you know my name even with a court order as it is appent that you want to cause him some type of harm. if the bear was shot in the wild then that is life. I no longer hunt but others can with my blessing if they use the meat.
Where in my post did I imply that I wanted to cause him harm? My post was implying that he was hiding behind his gun and from his actions. You just proved my point that people like him are scared little boys afraid of their own shadow.
Killing animals for "sport" or just plain"fun" is a crime against nature and just plain wrong.Why would anybody feel good being a "superior" being armed with a high powered weapon - much less baiting -shoudn't make one proud but ashamed.Too bad so many people do not have a soul and cannot live and let live....as if life for every creature isn't hard enough!
"Hunters"? Hardly. More like little insecure "boys" that need to demonstrate their "manliness" by blasting animals with high-power weapons. The best argument from these wimps is that they're "thinning the herd of weak individuals". Yet, what they target are the biggest and healthiest that would likely survive. Grow up boys. The size of your gun isn't going to help the size of your "gun".
Robert, you seem obsessed with men/boys and the size of their penises.
Also, I doubt that women who hunt, and they are numerous, are "boys" out to prove their "manliness". I know some women who are hunters, and they are intelligent, attractive, feminine and absolutely heterosexual.
I support hunting to a limited degree, and black bears aren't exactly endangered. But to deliberately seek out a bear that you know is being monitored and followed is just a low and mean thing. Not to mention, it just gives hunters a reputation as a bunch of depraved and cruel jerks.
And bait stations? Really? Well, I guess it's better than a bunch of yutzes firing at whatever moves on the fly and hitting people or livestock.
Man must remember, the black bear is biological diversity, a creator and savior of his ecosystem. The ecosystem is only as alive and life giving as its bears and all species of biological diversity. This bear is in the eco-nomics and safety of the very life zone of the Earth, the biosphere or a life giving Earth.
Actually, hunting is more necessary now than ever - especially for deer.
Read and find out why. This same kind of thing applies to other species besides deer. Hunters don't want to erradicate all animals, they just want the populations to be in check.
And you know this how, Mike? How many hunters do you know? I know a lot of them, and the vast majority of them have far more respect for animals and the environment than the "moralists" who go to the grocery store, buy their prepackaged, antibiotic/anthelmentic laden "meat" (and please don't remind them it came from a real animal that someone killed in a meat processing plant in a very unsportsmanlike way), then pass judgment on a whole group of people - hunters - based on stereotypical media representations that have more to do with filling the theater seats and selling commercial time than they do with reality! I knew as soon as I read this headline that the comments would be full of such judgmental, knee-jerk, uniformed opinions.
What a low level piece of crap. Luring a semi tame bear with food. I am sure we will read about this gutless piece of crap, probably in the arrest section of the newspaper.
That is how bear are hunted in MN, Long before Lynn Rogers began studying them. Lynn Rogers knows full well the risks he creates for the very bears he studies by acclimating them to people. He could have chosen to study any number of protected species or non-game wildlife without these issues.
He claims to be a scientist but wants the rules changed so his bears do not face the same risks other bears do. So much for science. He also can buy as much land as he can afford and put no hunting signs all over it. He profits greatly from his webcams and donations.
I am not a hunter. But I know what the fees and extra taxes hunting pays for and I enjoy wandering around various wildlife areas created and funded by hunting. I get to enjoy these very same areas for most of the year without encountering hunting, free of charge.
Yes, this man sounds like a psychopath. The first sign of pathology of the human mind is, deriving pleasure from hurting animals. We need to be very worried about this nut.
Yet another example of needles animal homocide. Humans are hopeless. They just will not stop inflicting torture, pain, death and destruction upon our fellow creatures, justifying it by calling it "hunting" or "sport." Some a-hole with a gun or bow removed a beautiful creature from our midst. I wish that all humans who felt this is legitimate sport or entertainment would then "hunt" each other. Let them trap each other in those horrific leg iron traps, beat each other over the head and skin each other, shoot a high-power arrow into a hip and track the blood until death or the other hunter is caught and shot again to death, or let them shoot at each other and "hunt" with rifles or guns of their choice. They can set out beer for bait. Now that would be real sport.
...aaaaaaand you just lost any moral authority you claimed to have when you assigned a higher value to the life of an animal than to any human. I bet you also claim to be against the death penalty too. Hypocrite.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaand Big Matt, you just lost any benefit of doubt as to the level of your intelligence when you said "life of an animal to ANY human". ANY human, huh?
And if you have ever taken antibiotics, used insecticide or pesticide, or gotten immunized against influenza, in fact if you have ever washed or bathed, you have actively participated in the killing of innocent living entities not used for food.
Not all life is sacred to us. Some life forms are not sacred to anyone. The HIV virus and ebola, smallpox, and malaria are all examples of living entities which we as humans are trying to eradicate simply because they exist.
So, really what it comes down to is that as humans, we selectively respect some life forms.
Sadly, the hunter realized that even after shooting a big-bad bear, he was still hung like a 9 year old. He hung his head in disappointment as he climbed into his giant pick up truck and drove off.
woodchuck why is it that when one side or the other runs our of FACTS they resort to innuendo, insults and name calling... It makes them look like a 9 year old.
And before you start lumping those who don't agree with you into a category. No I am not a hunter. Never have been. I've seen too many COW deer dead in the fields. Yes I own a gun as is my right. I am generally anti death penalty due to the many errors that have been proven and pro choice because it is no ones business but the mother and father and their God. I am also anti moron with a gun. The guy in the story qualifies as a moron by the fact he doesn't have the sense to realize how upsetting this would be to people.. or perhaps he did simply because they would be.
To kill any bear is disgusting! There is no need for it in this day and age. Humane contraceptive control plans exists and it has been proven that hunting has not been an effective population control method for bears and for most wildlife like are hunted. State Wildlife Divisions are the ones to blame as they make money by selling hunting permits and licenses to insecure humans who need the thrill of the kill.
"The DNR is mandated to provide bear hunting opportunities and reducing bear-human conflicts is one reason, DNR spokesman Scott Pengelly said."
When the hunter steps into the woods, he is in the bears' environment and so the conflict is caused by the hunter, not the bear. And so our answer to conflict with wildlife is to kill the wildlife? Very logical...
The bear-human conflict reduction benefits the neighborhoods the bears would be forced into when overpopulation occurs. The dominant male removes all competition from his area forcing the bears into new areas. Those areas include areas where people live.
Why are the hunters allowed to "bait" the wildlife - it makes it pretty easy to kill, rather than track as a good hunter/sportsman should do. And do they really have to rub salt in the wounds of people who are against hunting/killing by posting such comments as this hunter did, joking or not, it is still not good sportmanship. Most of these hunters don't even use the meat. It's sad!
In comparison to escapes at hunting stands, far more animals are injured and escape only to slowly die after being tracked through the woods in a "sportsmanlike" manner. It's incredibly hard to get a clean kill shot when you and the animal are "on the move." Staking out a known trail or baiting an area greatly increases the likelihood that the animal will be killed instantly. Of course, if you're just too locked into the "hunter evil, grocery store good" mentality, then you probably consider it far more "sporting" to just buy your hamburger at the market, since of course it doesn't come from an animal, and even if it does THAT animal had a sporting chance ... as it was loaded into the truck to go to the processing plant to be rendered into a product for you to buy as you congratulate yourself on how humane you are...sigh, the arrogance is amazing...
First the despicable method of bear hunting is "with the aid dogs" i.e. chasing and treeing a bear with dogs, then shooting it out of the tree.
This is the method I advocate banning.
I hunt bear in WI, still hunt without the aid of dogs. There are way too many bear and sound wildlife management practices are needed to keep them in check...
This means hunting.
You can cry all you want, and accuse the legal hunter of killing "YOUR" bear deliberately, if it makes you feel better. But that won;t change the reality or need of hunting to keep these animals in check.
Go ahead attack me, I don't care, you simply are not well informed of all the relevant facts.
And bullying the media to release the name of this hunter so you can harass him shows your ignorance, and the reason to simply dismiss any of your opinions.
In fact, calling him out to harm him is a crime as it is implied that you WISH to see him come to harm, eh??? Where is law enforcement on this one???
I have some bear meat drying for jerky, and stew meat marinated right now , from a kill on our property this weekend by a neighbor who we allow to track his prey across our land. As a courtesy, gave us some meat....black bear meat, truth be told I prefer venison.
Ban bear hunting with the aid of dogs, and I will support it. It harasses the bears out of their normal pattern, and modifies their behavior .
I posted this above and will re-post part of it again. You are not aware of the relevant facts: "There is no need for it in this day and age. Humane contraceptive control plans exists and it has been proven that hunting has not been an effective population control method for bears and for most wildlife that are hunted. State Wildlife Divisions are the ones to blame as they make money by selling hunting permits and licenses to insecure humans (that is you BH) who need the thrill of the kill."
Way too many bears? I have to drive thousands of miles, just in hopes of even seeing a bear. Where are all the bears in Los Angeles, Boston, Chicago and Houston? Gee, and all along, I thought man's population was about 7 billion?
If a plant or animal is native and wild, like this bear, it is a strand in the web of all life, all the reasons you are breathing right now. This bear is a contributor and a community member of his ecosystem and is in the eco-nomics of a life giving Earth.
"The human economy, social structure and the well-being of our species rest on the bedrock of the health and welfare of integrated ecological systems. Every breath we take, every bit of sustenance we consume daily are totally dependent on the interrelationships between the atmosphere, soil, water and THE DIVERSITY OF SPECIES THAT INHABIT THE PLANET WITH US..."
Oh THANK YOU Bosshoss for protecting all of us from the mean old vicious black bear! You're providing such a valuable service! Given that you're more likely to be killed or injured by having a vending machine fall over on you, I suggest you start stalking that very rare and dangerous "Cold Soda Machine" creature! Use a .308 or larger, and soak yourself in Diet Dr. Pepper to throw off the scent! The meat is a little tough, but considering you're a manly-man, you won't have any problems.
There are many hunters out there that are responsible and I do thank you for that. However, I have heard many of you say that no matter how unethical baiting bears is, it is still legal. There are many things in this country that are legal, but unethical and that is no valid excuse. It is unethical, but legal to bundle many mortgages together, some good, some horrible, and sell them to third parties with a AAA rating. Where did that get us...the worst recession since the 1930's.
We need to as people think about each other and how one person's actions affects the people around us and future generations. I live in CO and we are thinking of allowing hunters to hunt elk in Rocky Mountain National Park since the population is out of control. People believe hunting is the answer. Well, right now hunting is the answer, but why is the population out of control. It is because hunters have already killed all the elk's preditors. There are no wolves in CO and haven't been for years because humans killed all of them. It is that way with many other animals n this state too, like the Lynx. We try to reintroduce them, but they either migrate out of the state or they get poached.
I am one of the thousands that have followed the birth of Hope. It breaks my heart if she did get shot. I can not imagine a person doing this on purpose. Karma is going to bite him in the ...
Being a hunter myself, I do not have a problem with the fact the guy is a hunter. While I am not a fan of baiting stations, I do not see much sport in it, as long as it is legal, it is okay. The problem I have is the fact that he would brag about trying to get that particular bear and that since it is only two years old, it wouldn't be big enough to make it worth while to shoot anyway, unless he distinctly knew that it was her. No it was not illegal, but that does not make it right.
He said, "Lily, a bear with a bounty". It would appear, he had it in for this particular bear, and if this is the case, he is a psycho.
Personally, I can't even kill a spider -- because I don't believe I have the inherent right to do harm and cause pain to anything. I can't imagine how anyone can derive pleasure and joy from the pain and suffering to anything. Because man is in the catbird seat and powerful and can do such harm is when he becomes a gentle sheperd of Holy Creation.
Still, Rogers said he has to wonder if the hunter deliberately sought out Hope. He said the hunter has posted messages before on a Facebook page with around 50 fans called "Lily: a bear with a bounty," where some postings last week spoke of "Hope jerky" or Hope cooked in a crockpot.
I agree with CBOL. This guy may have had the right, but it's individuals like him that give hunters a bad name. Much like all the name calling on this board by supposedly civilized individuals.
Hunting for food is the cycle of life. Hunting for sport is sad, but unfortunately it does happen. And for the record, we still don't know if the bear was really killed. Lighten up, folks...
Alright, I think it's time someone stood up for hunters and hunting in general.
Hunting wild animals for food is an acceptable alternative to buying meat from a grocery store. Meat from wild game is healthy, lean, and free of antibiotics and hormones. Small game animals especially, like upland birds, are a highly-sustainable meat source. Here in Michigan, a lot of effort is put into maintaining sufficient habitat.
Hunters, in general, care greatly about the species they hunt. Their license dollars go directly to habitat conservation and for game wardens to target poachers.
While baiting is seen as unethical by some, it is still a legal practice. Lets also remember that this was a wild bear.
The fact that this man apparently had it out for that particular bear is distasteful, but should not be reflective of hunters as a whole.
I don't know about your state but in Montana, hunters have to turn bear meat over to the state to be tested for parasites. They rarely get it back. Therefor, bear is not a safe meat animal.
As long as the hunter really is using the animal for food - No problem. Problem is that many don't - and come up with excuses as to why they don't.
Although you are wrong - baiting is not legal everywhere... (and it's not an ethical way to hunt if you ask me - baiting is hardly any closer to real hunting than a staged hunt with captive animals).
Make it an honest hunt - learn to track the animal you want to hunt.
I grew up with hunted meat on the table - deer, rabbit, squirrel. And even though I'm vegetarian now and don't *like* the idea of hunting, I still believe ethical hunting (versus sport) is more humane than factory farms. The issue with Hope is, if she was indeed killed, it was in a research area where the hunter knew it was a possibility it was her, and the fact that she was still small. I pray that the mentioned anti-Lily/Hope site isn't really how hunters feel, and it's just words spoken in frustration at the anti-hunting stance from the bear supporters. I like to think most hunters respect their kill like the Native Americans did.
sgt: the problem with tracking animals through the woods is that far too often the animal ends up injured but not killed. If the animal then escapes, it is usually facing a long and painful death. Hunting stands greatly reduce this problem. While I personally don't see the need to bait a stand if you are skilled at "reading" the environment - noting water sources, identifying game trails, etc. - I would much rather a hunter bait and kill cleanly than risk that animal suffering more than necessary. The problem is that as a society we have been so inundated with romantic images of the "great hunter" of the "glorious past" and of the "evil hunter" of the present (after all, if you're hunting, you aren't buying from the commercial meat producers) that we don't really think it through. Hunters of old resorted to raw tracking ONLY when other methods failed. Like any predator, the successful human hunter learns the nature of his/her quarry and uses that knowledge to determine the hunting ground.
Thanks. I just paid a visit to the Illinois River by Starved Rock and got up close and personal with the carp there. I'm writing some articles on my trip. Have they affected you in any way?
Last year the commercial fisherman in our area were paid to go out and get all the Asian carp they could. they had an article in our local paper about it. I know a lot of fisherman around here talk about them all the time. The corp of engineers are trying to get them under control
What's the name of the paper? It'd be nice to contact one of those fishermen. For now, the Army Corps is running the electric barrier, and they're about to turn up the juice. It was unfortunate to see the Illinois overrun with carp, though we did find other species that appeared healthy.
I laugh as I read these comments, are you whining crybabies serious????? Must be nice to live in your cradled little world where you go to the store and buy everything your heart ever desires. Do you cry every time you buy burger off the shelf? That cow was defenseless too! Bear baiting used to be a very common practice, and when it was allowed you could bait all the way till the week before the season opened. However, once the season began you'd still have to go out and hunt (hike your rear off) and find that animal you decide to shoot. Hunting is a great way to provide a low fat meat source to your families diet.
This is the same stupid argument I hear over and over again from low IQ hunters trying to justify themselves and their antiquated activity. Go mano-a-mano with the bears than I think it would be sporting. You are a fool!
Oh but I'm sure you'd advocate for the removal of bears and other wildlife from your residential area wouldn't you? Last I checked these animals used to roam freely everywhere, but I'm sure being the big man you are you'd go mano-a-mano to remove the animal yourself. IDIOT
I don't know why the hunter does not come out and reveal his name. He spent thousands of dollars on guns and ammo, clothes, boots, etc. trip planning, to kill a bear cub. He should be proud of his senseless hunting abilities. Go ahead and tell us what a challenge it was to kill a baited bear cub.
Because he is probably going to get death threats, that is why. Don't worry, it'll leak eventually. A jerk always has a hard time keeping their mouth shut.
I am an avid hunter having hunted almost every type of aanimal on multiple continants, but if the information is accurate here I would have to say this was out of line. As a hunter and sportsman we ensure we obey the laws, promote good sportsmanship and are ambassadores promoting the good of this sport. We strive to work in conjunction with state fish and game agencies. If this hunter even thought for a second that this animal was a part of a conservation program it should have been a pass, even if technically legal.
yeah just what a hunter needs is a sociopath like you tracking him down in the urban jungle. I am not a hunter but i am also not against hunting. Hunting is a necessary evil and we should all praise what they do. Not all hunters are ethical but that doesn't mean we don't need them. Most of the hunters i know have a deep respect for nature and animals. i would rather have a hunter shoot a deer than one get creamed on the highway and possibly injure someone. I had a blackbear in my back yard last year and only took pictures. Thank god that my young children or their friends where not out there or worse surprised the bear. you tree huggers would probably take the bears side anyway if something happened.
I agree hunting is necessary, I would not say it is evil. More like the natural cycle of the earth. Plants grow, animals eat them, the animals grow, we eat them and peppered throughout this cycle are the processed by products of consumption(poo) which is then absorbed back into the circle of life. That is the way of this planet, the way it was and the way it will continue to be. If for one moment you believe you can continue to exist without participating in the cycle then I dare you to try.
Bear-baiting.
Not a hint of sportsmanship.
Yes. I began reading the article with an open mind. Sad story, even though I may not like it hunting bears is legal after all.
However... I usually scream when politics are brought into unrelated threads and I'm not doing so now, but I'm afraid that I had a sinking feeling when I read the hunter's posts about Hope jerky and Hope in a crockpot. It seemed to me that he was making a statement.
Hand feeding a wild animal.
Bear won't have a chance. Nor will the innocent hiker.
My understanding is that Lynn Rogers advocates baiting, and I trust Lynn wholeheartedly. Baiting unfair? Definitely. BUT, it brings them out into the open where hunters have a clean shot. I would much rather have a bear taken out quickly, than being wounded and suffering.
number 6... thou shall not kill.
No, he just doesn't want psychotic eco-terrorists harrassing his family. You know, the mentally ill segment of our population that equate human life with animal life.....like you I suppose! The idiots who send a man to prison for 2 years for killing dogs(vicious problem breeds at that), when a man who is drunk and runs down and kills a father of 3 gets probation.
I don't know which story you're referring to concerning "a man who is drunk and runs down and kills a father of 3 gets probation." However, the fact that the system may have failed in one instance doesn't invalidate a decision made in an entirely unrelated case. Your logic is faulty.
Also, if you're going to go throwing around the word "idiot," you should probably make sure you don't look like one in the process. Vick was under investigation for running and financing an illegal interstate dog fighting operation. Those prosecuting him were originally intending on going after him under RICO provisions, again for financing and running illegal business operations. I can't really say there's anything idiotic about jailing someone for any of that ... because it's illegal - and it doesn't take an eco-terrorist to see that. The fact that he executed and/or had others execute animals did not help his case.
Poor bear. I wish him rebirth as a hunter, and wish the hunter a rebirth as the bear. So that the bear can then get even with the hunter... and then there will be another article and I will wish reverse again. So goes on the story of earth!.
I think we need to be worried about this hunter. "Lily, a bear with a bounty" sounds like something a sick mind would say. Why did he have it in for this bear?
Why would anyone wish to kill a bear? Do hunters eat bears? Anyone who enjoys killing a helpless, defenseless animal is mentally ill. Just seeing a bear in the wild does it for me.
This dude is missing a few brain synapses.
Sure do draw a lot of conclusions. Yes, the bears are eaten.
Yes, hunters and some non-hunters eat bear meat. Getting a bear is not as easy as you would think. They are smart and if you miss, can be deadly.
Black bears are not endangered either. Around the county that I live in, I know of 9 cubs born this year. I'm sure there are a lot more that I don't know about.
Hunting of bear, deer and other wildlife keeps the population in check. All you anti-hunting people should go to Audubon's website and read some of the pro-hunting (deer) articles that Ted Williams has written over the years.
Here's one to start with. It is on deer.
Most hunters, the responsible ones anyways, are for conservation of fields, forests, streams, lakes and rivers.
Not to poke at the issue too much, but hunting keeps the population in check from what? From what it would be if there weren't people hunting, or keeping it from a critical mass at which point you have human-animal interactions on the highway?
U Chi Student,
Hunting keeps the animal population in check from mass starvation from over consuming the resources available in the habitat. If the population is left unchecked, every one of the animals will starve. Then you have a secondary kill off, of another species that consumed the one that died out in the first starvation incident. Then you have other die offs, because the first species ate all the vegetation that might have been left over if hunting had reduced their numbers to a level that the habitat could support.
So, bottom line, all of you anti-hunters are the most virulent animal haters on the planet, if we had your way, all of the wildlife would die off, in a most horrible manner.
Many hunters I know are avid outdoors men that appreciate nature.
With that said. I choose not to hunt, mainly because I don't see hunting as a fair game. I can shoot pretty good and killing an animal that doesn't know i'm there from a 1/4 mile away hardly seems like a sport. Then you have to hack up this thing of beauty so you can pack it out. Seem's like a big pain in the ass. If you want good meat raise a heard of deer yourself. Wild animals have it hard enough.
I would prefer to enjoy them in the wild, let the cougars, wolf's and coyotes do the killing. If you want a real challenge that involves guns join the Marines.
So is it a "fair game" when a cow, a chicken, or a pig is crowded into a smelly truck, hauled into a processing plant, and killed amidst the terror-filled cries and stench of blood arising from its fellows? How hard did you have to work for the last steak you "hunted" at the supermarket? Sorry, but if you eat meat and buy it from giant agribusiness, YOU are the one supporting cruelty to animals! Yes, there are "trophy hunters" out there who care little to nothing about the animal, but most hunters are far more aware of the costs of survival and our indebtedness to the natural world than their critics are. Too many people slog complacently along, consuming the "products" of "factory farming" and believing they have deniability. Those same people are all too often ready to criticize the hunter who kills "Bambi's mom" to feed his/her family. That is the definition of hypocrisy.
Sounds pretty bad when you put it that way. But they are raised by human hands and provided for their whole life. Which they would not have in the wild. We raise them to eat them.
Bambi, was born in the wild. Life is difficult for Bamabi since she has to worry about predators, starvation, finding water and reproducing. Not to mention us trying to run them over in our cars and shoot them.
If I needed to survive off the land I would. I don't need to know I can, I know I can shoot a gun and know where to find animals. No more lessons necessary. Try becoming that Factory farmer. Which by the way, I eat local grass fed beef and free range chicken, so not really factory farmed food, I am against that. But trying to raise an animal is hard work. They aren't popping out every few seconds.
You sound pretty enraged, so maybe i'm infringing on a sacred belief of yours. But like I said, some of my friends and family hunt. I don't tell them they are bad, or that I hate them. I just have my feelings on the issue.
I'd say if you are "man enough" to be a hunter then you should be man enough to release your name. I think this just proves the theory that hunters are only "tough" when they are heavily armed and sniping at small critters. When it comes to being a real man and facing the consequences of your actions or admitting your wrongs, they are no where to be found.
Hunters wear backtags with their state ID on them... their name is public information. Good attempt though.
Did you read the article? Apparently not. Nice trolling though.
Yea, Dranon. Nice try, spode. They release his name and every bambi loving person on the planet will want his blood, as ironic as that may be.
Now, as for any hunter that get up in a tree stand and baits a drum to lure hapless animals. That's pretty chickensh*t. I once saw a show where Ted Nugent was doing that and was all proud of it. King Spode.
I would not let you know my name even with a court order as it is appent that you want to cause him some type of harm. if the bear was shot in the wild then that is life. I no longer hunt but others can with my blessing if they use the meat.
Where in my post did I imply that I wanted to cause him harm? My post was implying that he was hiding behind his gun and from his actions. You just proved my point that people like him are scared little boys afraid of their own shadow.
dranon,
What about you info? Name, address, phone number, etc.
"little boys afraid of their own shadow."
Ok Mr. Dranon.
spike-I think you scared him off....
Killing animals for "sport" or just plain"fun" is a crime against nature and just plain wrong.Why would anybody feel good being a "superior" being armed with a high powered weapon - much less baiting -shoudn't make one proud but ashamed.Too bad so many people do not have a soul and cannot live and let live....as if life for every creature isn't hard enough!
You had your say now I will have mine. Everything you say, in my opinion, is horse crap.
Exactly how small is your penis?
Retired at 40 and thinking you are better than the rest of the population. Everything retired says should be retired
If hunting was really a sport the hunter and the hunted would be equally armed.
yeah, kind of like hunting that pack of chicken, pork chops, ground beef, veal, etc. at the grocery store huh??
"Hunters"? Hardly. More like little insecure "boys" that need to demonstrate their "manliness" by blasting animals with high-power weapons. The best argument from these wimps is that they're "thinning the herd of weak individuals". Yet, what they target are the biggest and healthiest that would likely survive. Grow up boys. The size of your gun isn't going to help the size of your "gun".
If you want to prove that you are a real man, go hunt the bear with a knife. Only pussies need a high powered rifle.
Nice one, Sarge. Too true.
I know hunters who have killed black bear with a bow and arrow - no firearm on them at all. No dogs either.
I know those hunters too.
They do it for fun and that is beyond me.
Robert, you seem obsessed with men/boys and the size of their penises.
Also, I doubt that women who hunt, and they are numerous, are "boys" out to prove their "manliness". I know some women who are hunters, and they are intelligent, attractive, feminine and absolutely heterosexual.
RHODE ISLANDER-4182690 banned. New user making lots of personal attacks.
No thank you.
I support hunting to a limited degree, and black bears aren't exactly endangered. But to deliberately seek out a bear that you know is being monitored and followed is just a low and mean thing. Not to mention, it just gives hunters a reputation as a bunch of depraved and cruel jerks.
And bait stations? Really? Well, I guess it's better than a bunch of yutzes firing at whatever moves on the fly and hitting people or livestock.
Man must remember, the black bear is biological diversity, a creator and savior of his ecosystem. The ecosystem is only as alive and life giving as its bears and all species of biological diversity. This bear is in the eco-nomics and safety of the very life zone of the Earth, the biosphere or a life giving Earth.
Hunting is antiquated and no longer necessary, and bait stations are just plain unethical. They are a tool of the lazy.
I know there are ethical hunters out there, but they are few and far between.
Hunting is not unethical when used for food. It may surprise you that most hunters hunt for that very purpose. But using a bait drum . . . .
Actually, hunting is more necessary now than ever - especially for deer.
Read and find out why. This same kind of thing applies to other species besides deer. Hunters don't want to erradicate all animals, they just want the populations to be in check.
Obviously never walked into your kitchen after a bear has busted through a screen to get in. Won't feel so sorry for the bear afterward.
And you know this how, Mike? How many hunters do you know? I know a lot of them, and the vast majority of them have far more respect for animals and the environment than the "moralists" who go to the grocery store, buy their prepackaged, antibiotic/anthelmentic laden "meat" (and please don't remind them it came from a real animal that someone killed in a meat processing plant in a very unsportsmanlike way), then pass judgment on a whole group of people - hunters - based on stereotypical media representations that have more to do with filling the theater seats and selling commercial time than they do with reality! I knew as soon as I read this headline that the comments would be full of such judgmental, knee-jerk, uniformed opinions.
What a low level piece of crap. Luring a semi tame bear with food. I am sure we will read about this gutless piece of crap, probably in the arrest section of the newspaper.
Try reading the article. He did nothing wrong. Jeesh.
He put food out for weeks and when Hope came to eat, again he killed her. He is a killer.
That is how bear are hunted in MN, Long before Lynn Rogers began studying them. Lynn Rogers knows full well the risks he creates for the very bears he studies by acclimating them to people. He could have chosen to study any number of protected species or non-game wildlife without these issues.
He claims to be a scientist but wants the rules changed so his bears do not face the same risks other bears do. So much for science. He also can buy as much land as he can afford and put no hunting signs all over it. He profits greatly from his webcams and donations.
I am not a hunter. But I know what the fees and extra taxes hunting pays for and I enjoy wandering around various wildlife areas created and funded by hunting. I get to enjoy these very same areas for most of the year without encountering hunting, free of charge.
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/wmas/description.html
Now ask Lynn Rogers just what his contribution is.
The photo accompanying the article is an example of that. As they always say a fed bear is a dead bear.
Wow. What a big brave hunter he is to create a bait station and then shoot animals when they come to eat. That's right up there with tree stands.
Why on earth is bear hunting even legal?
Yes, this man sounds like a psychopath. The first sign of pathology of the human mind is, deriving pleasure from hurting animals. We need to be very worried about this nut.
Yet another example of needles animal homocide. Humans are hopeless. They just will not stop inflicting torture, pain, death and destruction upon our fellow creatures, justifying it by calling it "hunting" or "sport." Some a-hole with a gun or bow removed a beautiful creature from our midst. I wish that all humans who felt this is legitimate sport or entertainment would then "hunt" each other. Let them trap each other in those horrific leg iron traps, beat each other over the head and skin each other, shoot a high-power arrow into a hip and track the blood until death or the other hunter is caught and shot again to death, or let them shoot at each other and "hunt" with rifles or guns of their choice. They can set out beer for bait. Now that would be real sport.
...aaaaaaand you just lost any moral authority you claimed to have when you assigned a higher value to the life of an animal than to any human. I bet you also claim to be against the death penalty too. Hypocrite.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaand Big Matt, you just lost any benefit of doubt as to the level of your intelligence when you said "life of an animal to ANY human". ANY human, huh?
And if you have ever taken antibiotics, used insecticide or pesticide, or gotten immunized against influenza, in fact if you have ever washed or bathed, you have actively participated in the killing of innocent living entities not used for food.
Not all life is sacred to us. Some life forms are not sacred to anyone. The HIV virus and ebola, smallpox, and malaria are all examples of living entities which we as humans are trying to eradicate simply because they exist.
So, really what it comes down to is that as humans, we selectively respect some life forms.
Sadly, the hunter realized that even after shooting a big-bad bear, he was still hung like a 9 year old. He hung his head in disappointment as he climbed into his giant pick up truck and drove off.
Bingo!! LOL...
Lol.
woodchuck why is it that when one side or the other runs our of FACTS they resort to innuendo, insults and name calling... It makes them look like a 9 year old.
And before you start lumping those who don't agree with you into a category. No I am not a hunter. Never have been. I've seen too many COW deer dead in the fields. Yes I own a gun as is my right. I am generally anti death penalty due to the many errors that have been proven and pro choice because it is no ones business but the mother and father and their God. I am also anti moron with a gun. The guy in the story qualifies as a moron by the fact he doesn't have the sense to realize how upsetting this would be to people.. or perhaps he did simply because they would be.
This pathetic, spineless bear killer is just another example of humans at the lowest level. Truly sad and disgusting.
Disgusting. For the life of me I don't know how any human can enjoy killing another animal. To kill a bear cub is just disgusting.
To kill any bear is disgusting! There is no need for it in this day and age. Humane contraceptive control plans exists and it has been proven that hunting has not been an effective population control method for bears and for most wildlife like are hunted. State Wildlife Divisions are the ones to blame as they make money by selling hunting permits and licenses to insecure humans who need the thrill of the kill.
agn just how do plan on applying that contraceptive...
Yes the state DNR/DOW makes a dollar and spends it for everyone's benefit not just the hunters.
How do you feel about killing a bear that is killing/eating tourists in camp grounds? You did say:
F hunting
"The DNR is mandated to provide bear hunting opportunities and reducing bear-human conflicts is one reason, DNR spokesman Scott Pengelly said."
When the hunter steps into the woods, he is in the bears' environment and so the conflict is caused by the hunter, not the bear. And so our answer to conflict with wildlife is to kill the wildlife? Very logical...
The bear-human conflict reduction benefits the neighborhoods the bears would be forced into when overpopulation occurs. The dominant male removes all competition from his area forcing the bears into new areas. Those areas include areas where people live.
Why are the hunters allowed to "bait" the wildlife - it makes it pretty easy to kill, rather than track as a good hunter/sportsman should do. And do they really have to rub salt in the wounds of people who are against hunting/killing by posting such comments as this hunter did, joking or not, it is still not good sportmanship. Most of these hunters don't even use the meat. It's sad!
In comparison to escapes at hunting stands, far more animals are injured and escape only to slowly die after being tracked through the woods in a "sportsmanlike" manner. It's incredibly hard to get a clean kill shot when you and the animal are "on the move." Staking out a known trail or baiting an area greatly increases the likelihood that the animal will be killed instantly. Of course, if you're just too locked into the "hunter evil, grocery store good" mentality, then you probably consider it far more "sporting" to just buy your hamburger at the market, since of course it doesn't come from an animal, and even if it does THAT animal had a sporting chance ... as it was loaded into the truck to go to the processing plant to be rendered into a product for you to buy as you congratulate yourself on how humane you are...sigh, the arrogance is amazing...
You are all so un-informed.
First the despicable method of bear hunting is "with the aid dogs" i.e. chasing and treeing a bear with dogs, then shooting it out of the tree.
This is the method I advocate banning.
I hunt bear in WI, still hunt without the aid of dogs. There are way too many bear and sound wildlife management practices are needed to keep them in check...
This means hunting.
You can cry all you want, and accuse the legal hunter of killing "YOUR" bear deliberately, if it makes you feel better. But that won;t change the reality or need of hunting to keep these animals in check.
Go ahead attack me, I don't care, you simply are not well informed of all the relevant facts.
And bullying the media to release the name of this hunter so you can harass him shows your ignorance, and the reason to simply dismiss any of your opinions.
In fact, calling him out to harm him is a crime as it is implied that you WISH to see him come to harm, eh??? Where is law enforcement on this one???
I have some bear meat drying for jerky, and stew meat marinated right now , from a kill on our property this weekend by a neighbor who we allow to track his prey across our land. As a courtesy, gave us some meat....black bear meat, truth be told I prefer venison.
Ban bear hunting with the aid of dogs, and I will support it. It harasses the bears out of their normal pattern, and modifies their behavior .
Do you use "bait Stations"?
I posted this above and will re-post part of it again. You are not aware of the relevant facts: "There is no need for it in this day and age. Humane contraceptive control plans exists and it has been proven that hunting has not been an effective population control method for bears and for most wildlife that are hunted. State Wildlife Divisions are the ones to blame as they make money by selling hunting permits and licenses to insecure humans (that is you BH) who need the thrill of the kill."
Bears are far from defenseless.
#Black_bear_2
That info right there, is why I condone bear hunting. If not, those numbers would be alot higher.
Also read the reports, most of them werent being stupid, some were dragged from thier homes AND EATEN ALIVE.
These men hunt animals that can, will and have, kill and eat children. Go pick on deer hunters, leave them men protecting people alone.
Way too many bears? I have to drive thousands of miles, just in hopes of even seeing a bear. Where are all the bears in Los Angeles, Boston, Chicago and Houston? Gee, and all along, I thought man's population was about 7 billion?
If a plant or animal is native and wild, like this bear, it is a strand in the web of all life, all the reasons you are breathing right now. This bear is a contributor and a community member of his ecosystem and is in the eco-nomics of a life giving Earth.
Oh THANK YOU Bosshoss for protecting all of us from the mean old vicious black bear! You're providing such a valuable service! Given that you're more likely to be killed or injured by having a vending machine fall over on you, I suggest you start stalking that very rare and dangerous "Cold Soda Machine" creature! Use a .308 or larger, and soak yourself in Diet Dr. Pepper to throw off the scent! The meat is a little tough, but considering you're a manly-man, you won't have any problems.
apparently i cannot post links here, go look it up.
Moheeheeko: "leave them men protecting people alone."
Let me guess: 8th grade education?
Robert, let ME guess: no argument so you resort to picking out spelling mistakes?
Stay Classy
There are many hunters out there that are responsible and I do thank you for that. However, I have heard many of you say that no matter how unethical baiting bears is, it is still legal. There are many things in this country that are legal, but unethical and that is no valid excuse. It is unethical, but legal to bundle many mortgages together, some good, some horrible, and sell them to third parties with a AAA rating. Where did that get us...the worst recession since the 1930's.
We need to as people think about each other and how one person's actions affects the people around us and future generations. I live in CO and we are thinking of allowing hunters to hunt elk in Rocky Mountain National Park since the population is out of control. People believe hunting is the answer. Well, right now hunting is the answer, but why is the population out of control. It is because hunters have already killed all the elk's preditors. There are no wolves in CO and haven't been for years because humans killed all of them. It is that way with many other animals n this state too, like the Lynx. We try to reintroduce them, but they either migrate out of the state or they get poached.
Bating should be banned also. I think bating is unfair to the game
If you get really good at bating, does that make you a Master Bater?
I am one of the thousands that have followed the birth of Hope. It breaks my heart if she did get shot. I can not imagine a person doing this on purpose. Karma is going to bite him in the ...
When i say the phrase "Bait Station" I about threw up. Spineless excuse for a man this hunter is.
HE'S the spineless one? You almost threw up over a comment on a computer...
Being a hunter myself, I do not have a problem with the fact the guy is a hunter. While I am not a fan of baiting stations, I do not see much sport in it, as long as it is legal, it is okay. The problem I have is the fact that he would brag about trying to get that particular bear and that since it is only two years old, it wouldn't be big enough to make it worth while to shoot anyway, unless he distinctly knew that it was her. No it was not illegal, but that does not make it right.
He said, "Lily, a bear with a bounty". It would appear, he had it in for this particular bear, and if this is the case, he is a psycho.
Personally, I can't even kill a spider -- because I don't believe I have the inherent right to do harm and cause pain to anything. I can't imagine how anyone can derive pleasure and joy from the pain and suffering to anything. Because man is in the catbird seat and powerful and can do such harm is when he becomes a gentle sheperd of Holy Creation.
Modern man is the Noah of the Great Ark.
Still, Rogers said he has to wonder if the hunter deliberately sought out Hope. He said the hunter has posted messages before on a Facebook page with around 50 fans called "Lily: a bear with a bounty," where some postings last week spoke of "Hope jerky" or Hope cooked in a crockpot.
Yeah, I can guess what kind of guy this is.
Keep him away from the women and children.
If I needed to hunt to eat, I surely would. But I don't need to.
I agree with CBOL. This guy may have had the right, but it's individuals like him that give hunters a bad name. Much like all the name calling on this board by supposedly civilized individuals.
Hunting for food is the cycle of life. Hunting for sport is sad, but unfortunately it does happen. And for the record, we still don't know if the bear was really killed. Lighten up, folks...
Alright, I think it's time someone stood up for hunters and hunting in general.
Hunting wild animals for food is an acceptable alternative to buying meat from a grocery store. Meat from wild game is healthy, lean, and free of antibiotics and hormones. Small game animals especially, like upland birds, are a highly-sustainable meat source. Here in Michigan, a lot of effort is put into maintaining sufficient habitat.
Hunters, in general, care greatly about the species they hunt. Their license dollars go directly to habitat conservation and for game wardens to target poachers.
While baiting is seen as unethical by some, it is still a legal practice. Lets also remember that this was a wild bear.
The fact that this man apparently had it out for that particular bear is distasteful, but should not be reflective of hunters as a whole.
Not too long ago, an article appeared, the vegetarian diet is the true fountain of youth. Humans do not have to consume meat.
That's a different argument altogether.
I don't know about your state but in Montana, hunters have to turn bear meat over to the state to be tested for parasites. They rarely get it back. Therefor, bear is not a safe meat animal.
As long as the hunter really is using the animal for food - No problem. Problem is that many don't - and come up with excuses as to why they don't.
Although you are wrong - baiting is not legal everywhere... (and it's not an ethical way to hunt if you ask me - baiting is hardly any closer to real hunting than a staged hunt with captive animals).
Make it an honest hunt - learn to track the animal you want to hunt.
I grew up with hunted meat on the table - deer, rabbit, squirrel. And even though I'm vegetarian now and don't *like* the idea of hunting, I still believe ethical hunting (versus sport) is more humane than factory farms. The issue with Hope is, if she was indeed killed, it was in a research area where the hunter knew it was a possibility it was her, and the fact that she was still small. I pray that the mentioned anti-Lily/Hope site isn't really how hunters feel, and it's just words spoken in frustration at the anti-hunting stance from the bear supporters. I like to think most hunters respect their kill like the Native Americans did.
sgt: the problem with tracking animals through the woods is that far too often the animal ends up injured but not killed. If the animal then escapes, it is usually facing a long and painful death. Hunting stands greatly reduce this problem. While I personally don't see the need to bait a stand if you are skilled at "reading" the environment - noting water sources, identifying game trails, etc. - I would much rather a hunter bait and kill cleanly than risk that animal suffering more than necessary. The problem is that as a society we have been so inundated with romantic images of the "great hunter" of the "glorious past" and of the "evil hunter" of the present (after all, if you're hunting, you aren't buying from the commercial meat producers) that we don't really think it through. Hunters of old resorted to raw tracking ONLY when other methods failed. Like any predator, the successful human hunter learns the nature of his/her quarry and uses that knowledge to determine the hunting ground.
Cengle: Well Said!! I couldn't agree more
Farmer:
Thanks. I just paid a visit to the Illinois River by Starved Rock and got up close and personal with the carp there. I'm writing some articles on my trip. Have they affected you in any way?
Last year the commercial fisherman in our area were paid to go out and get all the Asian carp they could. they had an article in our local paper about it. I know a lot of fisherman around here talk about them all the time. The corp of engineers are trying to get them under control
What's the name of the paper? It'd be nice to contact one of those fishermen. For now, the Army Corps is running the electric barrier, and they're about to turn up the juice. It was unfortunate to see the Illinois overrun with carp, though we did find other species that appeared healthy.
Union Banner is the name of the paper. They were fishing in Carlyle lake.
I hope this information helps you:)
Absolutely, thank you!
I laugh as I read these comments, are you whining crybabies serious????? Must be nice to live in your cradled little world where you go to the store and buy everything your heart ever desires. Do you cry every time you buy burger off the shelf? That cow was defenseless too! Bear baiting used to be a very common practice, and when it was allowed you could bait all the way till the week before the season opened. However, once the season began you'd still have to go out and hunt (hike your rear off) and find that animal you decide to shoot. Hunting is a great way to provide a low fat meat source to your families diet.
This is the same stupid argument I hear over and over again from low IQ hunters trying to justify themselves and their antiquated activity. Go mano-a-mano with the bears than I think it would be sporting. You are a fool!
Oh but I'm sure you'd advocate for the removal of bears and other wildlife from your residential area wouldn't you? Last I checked these animals used to roam freely everywhere, but I'm sure being the big man you are you'd go mano-a-mano to remove the animal yourself. IDIOT
well said Sky. these people will call u less of a man..while they buy their farm killed meat off the grocery store shelves! a*s hats.
All three of you name calling dipsticks are being foolish.
Get a grip eh? All three of you look stupid.
Did you just call them a name? Dipsticks! :)
I don't know why the hunter does not come out and reveal his name. He spent thousands of dollars on guns and ammo, clothes, boots, etc. trip planning, to kill a bear cub. He should be proud of his senseless hunting abilities. Go ahead and tell us what a challenge it was to kill a baited bear cub.
Because he is probably going to get death threats, that is why. Don't worry, it'll leak eventually. A jerk always has a hard time keeping their mouth shut.
I am an avid hunter having hunted almost every type of aanimal on multiple continants, but if the information is accurate here I would have to say this was out of line. As a hunter and sportsman we ensure we obey the laws, promote good sportsmanship and are ambassadores promoting the good of this sport. We strive to work in conjunction with state fish and game agencies. If this hunter even thought for a second that this animal was a part of a conservation program it should have been a pass, even if technically legal.
yeah just what a hunter needs is a sociopath like you tracking him down in the urban jungle. I am not a hunter but i am also not against hunting. Hunting is a necessary evil and we should all praise what they do. Not all hunters are ethical but that doesn't mean we don't need them. Most of the hunters i know have a deep respect for nature and animals. i would rather have a hunter shoot a deer than one get creamed on the highway and possibly injure someone. I had a blackbear in my back yard last year and only took pictures. Thank god that my young children or their friends where not out there or worse surprised the bear. you tree huggers would probably take the bears side anyway if something happened.
Pete
I agree hunting is necessary, I would not say it is evil. More like the natural cycle of the earth. Plants grow, animals eat them, the animals grow, we eat them and peppered throughout this cycle are the processed by products of consumption(poo) which is then absorbed back into the circle of life. That is the way of this planet, the way it was and the way it will continue to be. If for one moment you believe you can continue to exist without participating in the cycle then I dare you to try.